Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block using levobupivacaine versus periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration after totalknee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Both postoperative pain control and range of motion are important in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, in the literature, there is little comparison of peripheral nerve blocks and periarticular infiltration techniques using levobupivacaine. The aim of our study was to measure pain with visual analogue scale (VAS) and knee range of motion (ROM) between in patients undergoing adductor canal block (ACB) for TKA using levobupivacaine compared to periarticular levobupivacaine infiltration (PAI-L). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized clinical trial in a university hospital. METHODS: Patients aged 40-85 years who underwent unilateral TKA were included; 39 were treated withperiarticular infiltration using 40 ml (0.125 mg) of levobupivacaine (PAI-L group); and 40 were treated with ACB using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine (ACB-L group). Postoperative pain scores at rest and during active physical therapy were assessed using a VAS, along with knee ROM in flexion and extension. In addition, 100-foot walking time results, total morphine consumption and time of first analgesia requirement were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: VAS scores at rest and during active physical therapy and the total amount of morphine consumed were lower in the ACB-L group than in the PAI-L group (P < 0.05). In contrast, knee ROM in flexion and extension and 100-foot walking times were greater in the PAI-L group than in the ACB-L group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ACB-L was superior to PAI-L regarding pain treatment after TKA; however, PAI-L was superior to ACB-L regarding postoperative ROM and walking ability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ACTRN-12618000438257.

Tratamiento conservador de la osteoartrosis de cadera con toxina botulínica tipo A / Conservative treatment of hip osteoarthritis with botulinum toxin type A

Resumen Introducción: La osteoartritis de cadera es una enfermedad articular inflamatoria de bajo grado y etiología múltiple que tiene un manejo conservador limitado y poco explorado. La aplicación de toxina botulínica tipo A (BoNT-A) produce en el músculo aplicado una parálisis flácida temporal, delimitable y reversible, que aplicada de manera estratégica logra liberar estrés mecánico y dolor Objetivo: Evaluar el efecto en la percepción de dolor, funcionalidad y rigidez y los cambios en la flexión, rotación interna y externa, antes y 90 días después de la aplicación de BoNT-A. Métodos: Estudio clínico, experimental, longitudinal, abierto, con un total de 35 pacientes y 45 caderas tratadas. Se aplicó BoNT-A de 500 U en músculos ilíaco, músculo aductorbrevis y longus. Resultados: Se utilizó la prueba de Wilcoxon comparando los puntajes de evaluación en los días 0 a 90 observando disminución significativa del dolor referido (p < 0.0001), rigidez (p < 0.002), mejoró la función percibida (p < 0.001) y los arcos de movilidad: flexión, rotación interna y externa (p < 0.0001). Conclusiones: El tratamiento con BoNT-A otorga una opción conservadora y segura para el manejo de los síntomas y restricción física causada por la OA de cadera.

Abstract Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is a low-grade inflammatory disease of multiple etiology that has a limited conservative management and insufficiently explored. The application of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) produces in the applied muscle a temporary, delimitable and reversible flaccid paralysis, which applicated in a strategic way achives to reduce mechanical stress and pain. Objective: To evaluate the effect on pain perception, functionality and rigidity and changes in flexibility, internal and external rotation, before and 90 days after the application of BoNT-A. Methods: Clinical, experimental, longitudinal, open study, with a total of 35 patients and 45 hips treated. BoNT-A of 500 U was applied in iliac, adductor brevis and longus muscles. Results: The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the evaluation scores on days 0-90, observing the decrease in referred pain (p < 0.0001), rigidity (p < 0.002), improved perceived function (p < 0.001) and mobility arcs: flexion, internal and external rotation (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The treatment with BoNT-A provides a conservative and safe option for the management of symptoms and physical restraint caused by hip OA.

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Management of Upper Limb Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy: a Literature Review

The aim of this article was to present a review of the research literature on the outcome of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection for management of upper limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL and PUBMED for all published studies with full-length English text available. For each study, the quality of the methods and the strength of evidence were assessed by 2 independent reviewers based on the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) guidelines. Four studies of level I, 8 studies of level IV and 4 studies of level V were identified. Due to the limited number of studies with high quality evidence and inconsistent results among studies, we were unable to support or refute the usefulness of BTX-A injection for management of upper limb spasticity in children with CP. Moreover, we identified several variables that may affect the outcome of injection, such as timing of age, dosage, dilution volumes, localization techniques of target muscles and participant characteristics. In summary, we have presented a review the literature and a discussion of the considerable uncertainty and variation associated with the clinical use of BTX-A injection for management of upper limb spasticity in children with CP.

Efectos de la bromocriptina en pacientes con artritis reumatoide activa / Effects of bromocriptine in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

Background: Neuroendocrine factors play an important role in the expression of autoimmune disease. Proclatin (PRL) can induce T-cell proliferation and macrophage activation. Elevated PRL levels have been described in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and (RA). Aim and Methods: We studiend immunological and clinical effects of PRL suppression in 9 RA patients with active disease, treated for 3 months with bromocriptiner (BRC), an inihibitor of PRL secretion. Results: BRC induced a significant depression of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells response to antigen (p=0.008) and mitogen (p=0.008) which was significantly correlated with improvements in the HAQ disability index (r=0.68; p=0.04) and grip strength (r=0.7; p=0.02). Also, the in-vitro production of IL-2, nitric oxide and poliamines -that are critical for the proliferative response of lymphoid cells- decreased significantly. The group experienced significant improvement of grip strength (p=0.028) and the HAQ disability index (p=0.025), whereas 4 individuals archieved clinical improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition. We conclude that BRC treatment induces a significant depression of in-vitro immune function in RA patients and these changes are related to parameters of disease activity. The effects of BRC on immune function and disease activity in RA patients warrant further investigation